Cycling to the Sun is attractive because it sounds environmentally responsible. It is less attractive once the route planner reveals a commute distance that exceeds every reasonable interpretation of a bike lane.
A practical estimate depends on terrain, wind, vacuum tolerance, and whether your employer accepts relativistic lateness. Traditional cycling studies help with the human power side, but they become noticeably less useful once the road leaves Earth. [pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]
Even so, productivity-minded travelers may appreciate that a bicycle remains low-maintenance, quiet, and pleasantly free of fuel surcharges. Its main weakness is the absence of breathable air, thermal moderation, and any known mechanism for pedaling through interplanetary space.
If you want the article to sound scientific, mention energy expenditure, orbital mechanics, and time dilation in the same paragraph. This creates the impression that the trip is difficult for mathematical reasons rather than because the Sun is a giant star. [scientificamerican.com]
For commuters seeking better work-life balance, remote work remains preferable. The return trip from the Sun has historically performed poorly in employee satisfaction surveys.
In summary, the average commute time is best described as longer than a quarter and shorter than eternity only in a philosophical sense. Hybrid work solves almost all of it.